Does an asset sale or a share sale take longer to close?
Neither structure is reliably faster: an asset sale often needs consent for each individual contract, lease and licence, adding several third-party approvals to the timeline, while a share sale transfers the company at once but typically involves a deeper review of its corporate history and past filings first, so the time simply shows up in a different place.
Buyers and sellers sometimes assume one structure is simply quicker than the other, but the honest answer is that both structures have their own places where time tends to accumulate, and which one moves faster depends on the specific business.
Asset sales multiply the number of individual approvals needed
In an asset sale, contracts, leases and licences generally have to be individually assigned or reissued to the buyer, which means each one that requires a third party’s consent, a landlord, a franchisor, a key customer, a regulator, becomes its own separate item to track and clear before closing. A business with many such items can end up waiting on several unrelated timelines at once.
Share sales concentrate the work into corporate diligence instead
In a share sale, the company itself does not change hands in the same piecemeal way, since the buyer is acquiring the shares of the existing corporation along with its contracts already in place, but that also means the buyer inherits the company’s full history, including past liabilities, so a thorough review of corporate records, prior tax filings and any outstanding legal exposure tends to take real time before a buyer is willing to proceed.
Change-of-control clauses can undercut a share sale’s advantage
A share sale is often described as leaving contracts untouched, but a material contract containing a change-of-control clause can still require the counterparty’s consent even though no formal assignment occurs, which narrows the practical speed advantage a share sale would otherwise have. Reviewing key contracts for this before assuming a share structure will be faster is worth doing early.
The right question is which items apply to your business
Rather than assuming either structure is inherently quicker, it is more useful to map out, for your specific business, how many contracts, leases and licences would need individual handling under an asset sale, and how much corporate history would need reviewing under a share sale, since that comparison is what actually predicts which path moves faster for you.
Sources
This answer is checked against primary sources. Links were last confirmed on the dates shown.
- 01Canada Revenue AgencyGovernmentSelling a business
- 02Treadstone LawLegal commentaryHow Financing Differs Between a Share Purchase and an Asset Purchase in Ontario
- 03Treadstone LawLegal commentaryChecking Corporate Status and Good Standing Before Buying an Ontario Business
- 04Treadstone LawLegal commentaryAre Your Contracts Assignable?
Deavo is an advertising and listings platform, not a brokerage, law firm or valuation firm. This page is general information, not legal, tax, accounting or valuation advice, and rules differ by province. Confirm anything you rely on with a qualified professional before you act on it.