How does a sale work when the owner personally owns the building?
When an owner holds title to the real estate personally, outside the operating company, selling the business does not automatically involve the building. The buyer takes over the operating company, or its assets, and separately needs a lease with the seller as landlord, a purchase of the property, or a different location — each requiring its own negotiation, apart from the business purchase agreement.
This is a common structure among longer-established owner-operators: the building was bought personally years before incorporating the business, or kept out of the corporation deliberately, and a sale suddenly turns one informal relationship into two distinct legal ones.
The seller becomes the buyer’s landlord, or doesn’t
If the seller keeps the building, they need a genuine, arm’s-length lease with the buyer going forward, not the informal arrangement that may have existed while the seller also owned the business. A buyer’s lender will want the same term, renewal, and rent clarity in a newly formal lease that it would expect from any other commercial landlord.
Fair market rent has to replace whatever the old arrangement used to be
Many owner-occupied situations run on below-market or even no rent charged between the personal landlord and their own company, which works fine while both are the same person and stops working the moment a buyer is involved. The operating business’s financials need to be normalized to a fair market rent figure so the buyer is pricing the business on what it will actually cost to occupy the space going forward.
The two transactions can be structured to depend on each other
A buyer typically wants the purchase of the business conditional on getting a lease, or a purchase of the building, on acceptable terms, and a seller usually wants the business deal confirmed before finalizing what happens with the property. Making each transaction a closing condition of the other is standard practice and protects both sides from committing to only half of what they actually agreed to.
This is a structuring question for advisors, not just documentation
How the real estate is held personally versus corporately has real consequences for the seller’s own tax position and for what the buyer can finance. It is worth raising with a lawyer and accountant well before a buyer is at the table, since restructuring how the property is held is generally easier before a sale process starts than in the middle of one.
Sources
This answer is checked against primary sources. Links were last confirmed on the dates shown.
- 01Canada Revenue AgencyGovernmentSelling a business
- 02Treadstone LawLegal commentaryCorporate Law
- 03Treadstone LawLegal commentaryHow the Lifetime Capital Gains Exemption Shapes the Asset vs Share Decision in Ontario
- 04Treadstone LawLegal commentaryHow Financing Differs Between a Share Purchase and an Asset Purchase in Ontario
Deavo is an advertising and listings platform, not a brokerage, law firm or valuation firm. This page is general information, not legal, tax, accounting or valuation advice, and rules differ by province. Confirm anything you rely on with a qualified professional before you act on it.