Efforts standard (best, reasonable, commercially reasonable efforts)
An efforts standard is contract wording, such as best efforts or reasonable efforts, that sets how hard a party must try to achieve something it does not fully control, like a third-party consent, an approval, financing or an earn-out target.
An efforts clause can apply where a deal depends on an outcome outside one party’s control. A seller may promise to seek a landlord’s consent, or a buyer to pursue financing. Check whether the agreement defines the standard or lists the steps it requires. See third-party consent condition and the question of whether an LOI is binding.
How the Supreme Court has met them
In Southcott Estates v. Toronto Catholic District School Board, the school board was found to have breached its obligation to use its best efforts to obtain a severance that was a condition of the sale; the trial judge pointed, among other failings, to not contacting relevant city staff and delaying the severance application. In Sattva Capital v. Creston Moly, the arbitrator found an implied or express term that Creston would use its best efforts to secure a stock exchange approval, and that it did not. Sattva also says a contract is read as a whole to find the parties’ objective intentions, giving the words their ordinary and grammatical meaning, consistent with the surrounding circumstances known to the parties when the contract was made.
Honesty and Quebec
Under Bhasin v. Hrynew, a duty of honest performance applies to all contracts. These are common-law rules. In Quebec the Civil Code requires good faith (arts. 6, 7 and 1375). Ask what the document says the party must do, such as pay fees or take specific steps.
Sources
This definition is checked against primary sources. Links were last confirmed on the dates shown.
- 01Supreme Court of CanadaCourt decisionSouthcott Estates Inc. v. Toronto Catholic District School Board, 2012 SCC 51, [2012] 2 SCR 675 (Internet Archive capture of 2024-12-03)
- 02Supreme Court of CanadaCourt decisionSattva Capital Corp. v. Creston Moly Corp., 2014 SCC 53, [2014] 2 SCR 633 (Internet Archive capture of 2025-03-27)
- 03Supreme Court of CanadaCourt decisionBhasin v. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71, [2014] 3 SCR 494 (Internet Archive capture of 2026-10-24)
- 04Éditeur officiel du QuébecGovernmentCCQ-1991 - Civil Code of Québec
Deavo is an advertising and listings platform, not a brokerage, law firm or valuation firm. This page is general information, not legal, tax, accounting or valuation advice, and rules differ by province. Confirm anything you rely on with a qualified professional before you act on it.