Can a purchase agreement change the limitation period for claims?
Ontario lets the parties to a business agreement vary or exclude most limitation periods, Alberta lets an agreement extend a period but treats one that reduces it as not valid, and Québec does not let the parties agree a different period. The province’s law decides.
A purchase agreement can change the deadline for suing in some provinces and not in others, so the governing law matters before the wording does. A limitation period is a statutory time limit for starting a court proceeding; under section 4 of Ontario’s Limitations Act, 2002, unless the Act provides otherwise, the basic period is two years from the day the claim was discovered. The question for a buyer is whether a clause can lengthen, shorten or remove that statutory clock.
Ontario: a general bar with exceptions
Section 22 of Ontario’s Limitations Act, 2002 says a limitation period under the Act applies despite any agreement to vary or exclude it, subject only to the exceptions in subsections 22(2) to (6). One exception lets a period be suspended or extended by an agreement made on or after October 19, 2006, but the 15-year period in section 15 only if the claim has been discovered. Another applies only to a business agreement, meaning one made by parties none of whom is a consumer as defined in the Consumer Protection Act, 2002. For a business agreement made on or after that date, a period other than the section 15 period may be varied or excluded, and the section 15 period may be varied but suspended or extended only as just described. The Act defines “vary” to include extend, shorten and suspend.
Alberta: extending is allowed, reducing is not
Alberta’s Limitations Act says that if an agreement expressly provides for extending a limitation period, the period is altered in accordance with the agreement, subject to section 9. An agreement that purports to provide for reducing a period is not valid. Section 9 adds that an agreement must be in writing and signed by the person adversely affected, so an extension needs to be written and signed.
Québec and British Columbia
Québec’s Civil Code says no prescriptive period other than the one provided by law may be agreed upon, so the parties cannot set their own. Section 24 of British Columbia’s Limitation Act deals with acknowledgements of liability: if a person acknowledges liability before either of the limitation periods that apply to a claim expires, the claim must not be considered discovered earlier than the day of the acknowledgement. Apart from part payments and the other cases in subsections 24(7) to (9), an acknowledgement counts only if it is in writing, signed, and made by the person or their agent to the person with the claim or their agent, or to an official receiver or trustee under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. Other provinces have their own Acts.
A contract deadline is a separate question
An agreement can also set its own deadline for notifying a claim after closing, the survival period. How that deadline sits alongside the statutory periods above depends on the wording and the governing law, so put the exact clause in front of your lawyer. The time limit to sue for misrepresentation explains how the basic periods are counted.
Sources
This answer is checked against primary sources. Links were last confirmed on the dates shown.
- 01Government of OntarioGovernmentLimitations Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 24, Sched. B
- 02Government of AlbertaGovernmentLimitations Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. L-12
- 03Government of British ColumbiaGovernmentLimitation Act, S.B.C. 2012, c. 13
- 04Éditeur officiel du QuébecGovernmentCCQ-1991 - Civil Code of Québec
Deavo is an advertising and listings platform, not a brokerage, law firm or valuation firm. This page is general information, not legal, tax, accounting or valuation advice, and rules differ by province. Confirm anything you rely on with a qualified professional before you act on it.