Do employees need new contracts after an asset sale?
Yes. An asset sale does not carry the seller’s employment contracts across to the buyer, so each employee the buyer wants to keep needs a new offer of employment from the buyer. How that offer is drafted determines whether the person’s prior service, entitlements and terms carry forward.
This is one of the clearest differences between the two deal structures, and one of the most commonly missed. Buyers used to thinking of an acquisition as simply taking over a business are sometimes surprised that employment does not just follow the assets.
Why the contract does not transfer on its own
An asset purchase agreement moves specific assets and, usually, specific liabilities — inventory, equipment, contracts the buyer chooses to assume, goodwill. Employment contracts are personal to the employer named in them, and the seller remains that employer unless the contract is validly assigned with the employee’s consent or, more commonly, the buyer simply offers a new one.
What the new offer needs to address
- Start date, role, pay and location, stated clearly rather than assumed to match the old job
- Whether the offer recognizes the employee’s length of service with the seller, which affects future entitlements
- Whether existing benefits, vacation accrual and any bonus arrangements continue or reset
- Any restrictive covenants the buyer wants going forward, which cannot simply be copied from the old contract
Why “recognized service” is the clause that matters most
Most provincial employment standards deem service continuous for certain purposes when a buyer hires a seller’s employees to keep operating substantially the same business, regardless of what the new contract says. But common-law entitlements and internal policies are not automatically bound by that deeming rule, so the offer letter should say explicitly whether the buyer is recognizing prior service beyond what the law requires — silence here creates exactly the kind of ambiguity that ends up in a dispute.
Timing matters as much as content
Employees need a real opportunity to review and accept the new terms before their old job ends, not a document handed over at the closing dinner. A rushed offer with no time to consider it undermines the argument that the person freely accepted new terms.
Sources
This answer is checked against primary sources. Links were last confirmed on the dates shown.
- 01Canada Revenue AgencyGovernmentSelling a business
- 02Treadstone LawLegal commentaryDoes an Asset Sale Terminate Employment in Ontario?
- 03Treadstone LawLegal commentaryESA Section 9 and Continuity of Employment on an Ontario Business Sale
- 04Treadstone LawLegal commentaryEmployment Due Diligence Red Flags Before Buying an Ontario Business
Deavo is an advertising and listings platform, not a brokerage, law firm or valuation firm. This page is general information, not legal, tax, accounting or valuation advice, and rules differ by province. Confirm anything you rely on with a qualified professional before you act on it.